Air Ambulance Flowchart

Jackson Hole has access to several providers of air ambulance service, but patients have no way of knowing how much they will have to pay for it. On the high end, a bill can exceed $80,000.

Jackson Hole News&Guide reporter Kylie Mohr spent months interviewing patients, doctors, life-flight companies, lawmakers, lawyers, government regulators and others while also combing through government reports, corporate filings and more to describe the promises and the pitfalls of the service.

Part two of her series, “Haggling over the bill,” describes a web so complex that Mohr and graphic designer Samantha Nock created this flow chart to explain how “Air Ambulance Roulette” works.

Do you know what your insurance will cover if you need an air ambulance? The people in Mohr’s story didn’t. Part one of her report features profiles of residents who had to use it and how much they ended up paying out-of-pocket.

It also explores creative solutions, like one couple who bought air ambulance insurance for the entire Dubois area, and lawmakers who are seeking a federal waiver to extend coverage statewide.

Read part one here.

CASPER — A leading air ambulance company formally voiced its opposition to an ambitious plan by Wyoming policymakers to make aerial emergency transports a public utility funded under Medicaid in an effort to curb the cost of the flights. But the comment may be a moot point, as the federal government has signaled to state officials that the plan will likely be rejected.

The plan has been in the works for several months, as lawmakers and their analysts scrambled to find a solution to air ambulance costs in Wyoming. The plan, which requires federal approval, essentially would expand Medicaid in Wyoming to cover just air ambulance costs.

The service itself would be treated as a public utility; the state would, via a bidding process, select a Medicaid provider, set ambulance bases strategically and get a handle on costs.

Or so the plan goes. The state Department of Health has been working on the final stages of the plan — putting it out for public comment and preparing the waiver to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — in recent months. That public comment period is over, with Air Methods — one of the largest air ambulance companies in the country — blasting the waiver in a letter to the department that was released publicly.

In that statement, the company — which was purchased by a private equity firm for $2.5 billion in 2017 — disputed that there was a cost issue at all in Wyoming and said the waiver violates federal law. Indeed, it’s because of that federal law that the waiver is necessary in the first place: The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 prohibits states from placing any regulations or restrictions on air ambulances.

Enter the Medicaid waiver. In order to enact its plan the state has to have CMS — a branch of the federal Department of Health and Human Services — approve it. Because Medicaid is partially a federal program, it could be used to regulate the air ambulance industry. But it seems unlikely that’s going to fly, a Wyoming health official said Wednesday.

“They verbally told us they don’t believe they can approve the waiver,” said Franz Fuchs, a policy analyst with the department who has championed the ambulance effort.

Fuchs added that CMS fears the waiver would still violate the federal anti-regulation law. The agency is also concerned that the waiver wouldn’t be budget neutral, though Fuchs insists that they have proven it would be.

Fuchs said the state Health Department is still planning to submit the waiver, though the document itself needs some work in his office and with the governor. He said that at the very least his department would want feedback on what they could do to improve the waiver.

The News&Guide shares articles and receives permission to reprint articles through the Wyoming News Exchange.

Managing Editor Rebecca Huntington has worked for newspapers across the West. She hosts a rescue podcast, The Fine Line. Her family minivan doubles as her not-so-high-tech recording studio.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.