Hunter-killed grizzly

The Wyoming Government is being sued by conservation groups over a new law that authorizes the hunting of grizzly bears, regardless of the species’ federal status.

A 5-day-old Wyoming law allowing grizzly bear hunting — regardless of the species’ federal status as a threatened species — is drawing legal challenges from environmental groups.

The Legislature approved Senate File 93, “Grizzly bear hunts,” by a wide margin last week, and two days later, Gov. Mark Gordon signed it into law. The legislation green-lights a Wyoming grizzly hunt, even though the bears are classified as “threatened” under the federal Endangered Species Act.

On Wednesday, five environmental groups filed an intent to legally challenge the new law, which puts state law in conflict with federal law.

“The state of Wyoming has enacted a law that directs the Wyoming Game and Fish Department to schedule a hunt for grizzly bears, despite the fact that the Endangered Species Act absolutely forbids the killing of a listed species,” Western Watersheds Executive Director Erik Molvar told the Jackson Hole Daily. “Clearly, the Wyoming Legislature once again doesn’t understand its role under the U.S. Constitution.”

The Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Humane Society and Jackson Hole-based Wyoming Wildlife Advocates also signed the notice, which is a required precursor to a lawsuit when litigating the Endangered Species Act.

The Legislature’s new law has been widely perceived as a symbolic gesture stemming from frustration with federal courts having twice revoked the state’s ability to manage grizzlies. The law’s language is permissive, rather than being worded as a mandate that Wyoming hunt grizzly bears.

“The reason we don’t say ‘shall’ is because we can’t ask our Game and Fish people to be convicted felons,” said Sen. Eli Bebout, R-Riverton, who co-sponsored the bill, last month. “That’s what it would do if we did that.”

At one point during the legislative session, the bill was amended to direct that problem-causing grizzly bears be relocated to California, though the final version added “other willing states with suitable habitat” and those with populations below the threshold for federal protection.

Reps. Jim Roscoe, I-Teton/Sublette/Lincoln, and Andy Schwartz, D-Teton, and Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Teton, voted for the bill, while Rep. Mike Yin, D-Teton, opposed it.

Molvar deemed it worthwhile to take legal action, even though the new law is unlikely to result in an actual grizzly hunting season.

“I think it’s important anytime the state of Wyoming ... makes moves to target a native predator for extermination that the public push back as hard as we can,” Molvar said. “The state government backing a comprehensive war on native wildlife in order to support the agriculture industry, or in a misguided attempt to prop up game species, is an embarrassment.”

Biologists believe there are 700 or so grizzlies in the portion of the tristate Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem where the population is estimated. Wyoming contains the majority of the occupied grizzly habitat. Before U.S. District Court Judge Dana Christensen issued a restraining order blocking a hunt, Wyoming was days away from its first grizzly hunting season in 44 years, which would have targeted 21 bruins.

The environmental group’s notice of intent to sue contends that Wyoming misinterpreted the U.S. Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which concerns state sovereignty, when lawmakers signed SF93 into law. The 10th Amendment does not provide a legal basis for the Legislature or the Game and Fish Commission to override the Endangered Species Act, the legal notice states.

“Nor does it provide a basis for ignoring the decision of the District Court,” the legal notice states. “Courts have repeatedly recognized that where a federal law reflects a valid exercise of Congressional authority, state laws or regulations conflicting with that of federal laws are preempted due to the Supremacy Clause.”

Representatives for Gov. Gordon did not respond to interview requests Thursday.

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067, env@jhnewsandguide.com or @JHNGenviro.

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them for 7 years. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Diane Halpin

Having lived in Jackson Hole part-time for many years and only seeing one grizzly the entire time, knowing how the Craigheads fought to preserve the grizzly and expand the population, knowing the problem of in-breeding of a reduced number in any one species, and knowing the history of Jackson Hole, I can't understand how anyone who loves wild Wyoming would support such a bill.

Darrin Bingham

You have to love these group who abuse the US Constitution on a daily basis Now are conveniently using it to defend there position as it relates to grizzly bear hunting! It’s interesting how marijuana violate federal law but states disregard the federal law and make state law contrary to federal law statutes! Two tier justice system is alive and well.

Ken Chison

Great point Darrin. I had talked to several representatives and game and fish personnel about the same thing. If Federal law on drug use can be circumvented, we should be able to do it on a controlled grizzly hunt as well. Funny how most liberals, who oppose a hunt, only want laws broken when it's in their own sick and demented interest.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.