St. John's Board - Northern South Park

The St. John’s Health Board of Trustees supported neighborhood planning in northern South Park Thursday, but some members of the board dissented, concerned that the motion could signal support for the Gill’s proposal to develop 300 or so units of housing in northern South Park.

The hospital board is not a monolith when it comes to northern South Park.

Three of the seven members of the St. John’s Health Board of Trustees voted Thursday against a motion that saw the board request a strategy for housing employees in the next six weeks so the results could inform neighborhood planning in the area, though the motion passed with the majority of the board in favor.

The vote, marred by technical difficulties, came after an executive session in which the board apparently discussed a real estate deal, housing and the Gill family’s proposal to develop about 300 lots in northern South Park.

The family has touted the hospital’s housing needs as a reason for moving ahead with the controversial development, though St. John’s and the family had not reached a formal agreement by Monday, when CEO Paul Beaupre laid out for the Teton County Planning Commission the hospital’s need for 160 units of housing in the next few years.

Board members who supported Thursday’s motion said it was strictly focused on the pending neighborhood planning process in northern South Park, but other trustees said it appeared to signal support for the Gills’ proposal.

“The final recommendation will be used to provide input to Teton County and others as they develop their neighborhood plans,” Board Chair Cynthia Hogan said during the Thursday meeting, reading the motion. “We urge our county commissioners to accelerate the development of the northern South Park plan as a high priority to our community.”

Trustee Joe Albright thought the language was too loose. He called for an amendment striking the sentence urging action from the County Commission, launching into a story about seeking advice from the late Ralph Gill when he was appointed to the board.

“What I took from that meeting with Ralph is that I better be darn sure I was careful that I took the time to understand an issue before I had to decide anything,” Albright said, “and I’m guessing that if Ralph was on our board right now, he would want to know all the ins and outs of the northern South Park proposal and its effect on the hospital before he signed up for it.”

“Therefore,” he said, “I think it’s premature to urge the county to do something which could be interpreted as approving the Gill proposal at this time.”

Other members of the board pushed back, saying the motion was not, in fact, about support of the Gill family’s proposal to develop housing in northern South Park.

“I believe that we’re asking for acceleration of a process that should take place,” Trustee Sue Critzer said. “We’re not trying to usurp it or support a particular development plan that has been put in front of the commission. So my vote is in favor of encouraging to go through the neighborhood plan in an expedient fashion.”

Sixty-five percent of the lots the Gills are eyeing would be deed restricted in some way for the local workforce, according to a covenant recorded on the property, and 30 or 40 would be gifted to Habitat for Humanity of the Greater Teton Area.

Community members have pushed back against the proposal, questioning how affordable the homes would be if built. The Planning Commission and Teton County Planning Director Chris Neubecker have both advised the Teton County Board of County Commissioners to deny the Gills’ application to rezone 74 acres of the Jackson Hole Hereford Ranch, arguing for neighborhood planning before rezones.

No other board member seconded Albright’s proposal — amending the motion to drop the last sentence urging the County Commission’s action — so it failed. Albright voted against the motion, saying he supported the development of the housing strategy.

Four members of the board then voted in favor of the motion, so it passed. Technical issues caused the board to move on before Trustees Mike Tennican and Bruce Hayse weighed in.

When Hayse got back on the line, he, like Albright, appeared to conflate the motion the hospital board passed with the Gill proposal.

“The thing that really disappoints me today about our lengthy discussion of the proposal today, there was not a mention of any type of compliance with the county Comprehensive Plan, there was no mention of what any kind of housing development might mean for the valley as a whole,” Hayse said. “I understand that the board is dedicated to helping the hospital, but I’m really disappointed that there’s no bigger perspective.”

Tennican also voted against the proposal, but did so digitally after the connection broke down and didn’t expand on his reasoning.

Contact Billy Arnold at 732-7063 or

Teton County Reporter

Previously the Scene editor, Billy Arnold made the switch to the county beat where he's interested in exploring Teton County as a model for the rest of the West. When he can, he still writes about art, music and whatever else suits his fancy.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
As of Oct. 18, 2020, the News&Guide has shifted to a subscriber-only commenting policy. You can read about this decision on our About Us page. Thanks for engaging in the conversation!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.