Snow King Mountain

The town Planning Commission reopened the discussion of Snow King’s master plan on Wednesday, but they continued the subject to their next meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Nov. 21.

As Snow King and Jackson officials chart the future of development on the Town Hill, some major details of the resort’s obligations — and how to fund them — remain undecided.

The town Planning Commission on Wednesday revisited Snow King’s master plan update, resurrecting a public review process that fizzled out earlier this year after months of tense negotiations between the resort and town. Since then, resort officials have revised the master plan to concede to a long list of amendments the Town Council requested.

Perhaps the most significant is a requirement that the Snow King Resort Master Association — an HOA-like group of property owners in the resort district — levy a 1% fee on all commercial transactions within the district. That money would be used to fund the responsibilities laid out in the master plan, but it’s still unclear exactly what those responsibilities are.

During the resort’s first attempt to update its master plan last year, ambiguities in the original document led to an impasse between those who believe that the association, known as SKRMA, had failed to fulfill its purpose in funding the ski area and those who argue it was never meant to fund the ski area at all.

“Looking back at the original plan, it’s sort of like looking at the Bible,” said Snow King watchdog Skye Schell, executive director of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance. “Everybody can pick out a different verse or have a different interpretation.”

The importance of resolving that confusion is one point on which everyone can agree. Though the town has found SKRMA to be in compliance with the original master plan, Community Development Director Tyler Sinclair admitted that is largely because its requirements are vague.

“There’s always been some gray there,” he said.

As the recipients of community resentment over SKRMA’s perceived shortcomings, resort officials are as eager as anyone to lay out, in no uncertain terms, what is expected of the association in the new master plan.

“We very much don’t want to have a situation in the future where different people have different opinions about whether we’re in compliance or not,” said Jeff Golightly, a Snow King representative. “We want it to be crystal clear.”

The Planning Commission broached the subject Wednesday, but the brief discussion only raised more questions. Besides the obscurity around SKRMA’s obligations, it’s also unclear whether certain properties in the resort district are exempt from SKRMA, and whether the 1% fee will apply to condo sales.

As of now the resort does not intend for it to apply to condo sales, but Schell and others argued that this is key to keeping Snow King financially viable because “that’s probably a much bigger chunk of money than 1% on hamburgers and lift tickets.”

The Planning Commission will meet again at 5:30 p.m. on Nov. 21 to continue the master plan discussion.

Contact Cody Cottier at 732-5911 or

Cody Cottier covers town and state government. He grew up with a view of the Olympic Mountains, and after graduating Washington State University he traded it for a view of the Tetons. Odds are the mountains are where you’ll find him when not on deadline.

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Katy Klotz

When we first bought our condo, Manuel Lopez was still alive. He must be turning over in his grave to see how the vultures have descended upon the homeowners, pecking, pecking, pecking; and demanding more and more money and taxes from the community he so lovingly created. Sad,

Bruce Morley

Snow King is a great financial and cultural asset to the Town of Jackson, yet the Town seems determined to make it almost impossible for Snow King to make the upgrades necessary for it to stay in business. It's nuts!

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
The News&Guide welcomes comments from our paid subscribers. Tell us what you think. Thanks for engaging in the conversation!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.