'Faulty' science used by Trump appointees to cut owl habitat

Political appointees in the Trump administration relied on faulty science to justify stripping habitat protections for the imperiled northern spotted owl, shown, U.S. wildlife officials said Tuesday.

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Political appointees in the Trump administration relied on faulty science to justify stripping habitat protections for the imperiled northern spotted owl, U.S. wildlife officials said Tuesday as they struck down a rule that would have opened millions of acres of West Coast forest to potential logging.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reversed a decision made five days before President Donald Trump left office to drastically shrink so-called critical habitat for the spotted owl. The small, reclusive bird has been in decline for decades as old-growth forests were cut in Oregon, Washington and California.

Government biologists objected to the changes under Trump and warned that they would put the spotted owl on a path to extinction, documents show.

But Trump’s Interior Secretary, David Bernhardt, and former Fish and Wildlife Service Director Aurelia Skipwith dismissed those concerns — instead adopting a plan to lift restrictions on more land than even the timber industry had sought.

In documents disclosed to The Associated Press prior to their public release, wildlife officials said Bernhardt and Skipwith underestimated the threat of extinction and relied on a faulty interpretation of the science to reach their decision.

Bernhardt defended his handling of the matter, telling the AP in an email that Congress gave the interior secretary authority to exclude areas from protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Bernhardt said the agency’s “reasonable certainty” the owl would go extinct did not match the law’s requirement that habitat be protected lest a species “will” go extinct.

If wildlife officials want to change that standard, he said, “they should seek a change from Congress.”

“Any future Secretary can weigh the benefit factors differently, but they cannot change the law or the legal standard,” he wrote.

Officials twice delayed the changes after President Biden took office and they never went into effect. That puts them among numerous Trump-era policies reversed or struck down by the Interior Department in recent months, on issues from oil and gas drilling on some public lands, to protections for birds from power line and wind turbine collisions.

Democratic lawmakers from Oregon, Washington and California in February called for an investigation into the removal of spotted owl protections, citing potential scientific meddling by Trump appointees.

Wildlife advocates, government agencies and the timber industry have sparred for decades over the northern spotted owl, which officials said Tuesday is in “precipitous decline” and getting close to disappearing from parts of Washington and Oregon. Federal habitat protections imposed in 2012 were meant to avert the bird’s extinction. They’ve also been blamed for a logging slowdown that has devastated some rural communities.

Of 9.6 million protected acres, federal officials proposed in August 2020 to remove protections for about 2%.

The timber industry said the plan didn’t go far enough and called for removal of more than 28%. On January 7, Skipwith changed her agency’s recommendation and went even further, telling Bernhardt more than one-third of the protected land, or 3.5 million acres, should be excluded from protection.

The land has huge swaths of timber and includes 2 million acres spread in a checkerboard pattern across western Oregon.

Logging those lands might not have killed off the owls immediately — they live up to 20 years on individual territories that can stretch across 10,000 acres — yet eventually they would have gone extinct, said Paul Henson, the wildlife service’s Oregon supervisor.

When Henson brought his concerns to superiors last December, Skipwith overrode them.

“You can’t remove over a third of an endangered species’ habitat and not expect it to go extinct,” Henson said. “There wasn’t much disagreement about the science. The disagreement was how much that risk constrains the secretary’s authority” to remove habitat protections.

The logging industry says more thinning and management of protected forests is necessary to prevent wildfires, which devastated 560 square miles of spotted owl habitat last fall. Most of that area is no longer considered viable for the birds.

Timber interests have said much of the land set aside under Tuesday’s announcement isn’t actually spotted owl habitat or is broken up into parcels too small to support the owl. As such, the smaller habitat designation issued under Trump was “legally and scientifically valid,” said Nick Smith, a spokesman for the American Forest Resource Council. The group represents about 100 manufacturing and logging operations in five western U.S. states.

“The federal government cannot set aside critical habitat unless it is habitat for the species,” Smith said.

The logging industry says the larger, non-native barred owl is a much greater threat than cutting trees.

Environmental groups cheered Tuesday’s move but expressed frustration that about 200,000 acres of previously protected habitat were excluded under a replacement rule signed by Martha Williams, Biden’s nominee to lead the Fish and Wildlife Service.

“In the past 20 years, there’s been accelerated loss of old-growth forest on state and private lands so it’s continued to lose habitat,” said Noah Greenwald with the Center for Biological Diversity. Climate change adds to the threats, he said.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

David Cargill

Go figure.....

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
The News&Guide welcomes comments from our paid subscribers. Tell us what you think. Thanks for engaging in the conversation!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.