Lights. Camera. Real estate action.

Maybe the director didn’t mangle the old moviemaking phrase when he began filming the house at 165 Huckleberry Drive but he could have, given the elaborate nature of the four-minute film produced by two Engel & Volkers associate brokers that’s designed to lure buyers to the property.

Brief films about houses aren’t new, said Andrew Ellett, but the one he conceived with associate Devon Viehman is more than some marketing firm camera-pointer’s random tour of the property. Instead it’s a big show — at least by usual standards.

Ellett’s review of most of the see-the-house films he has seen during his real estate career?

“They are incredibly boring,” he said. “The only people who watch them are the people who make them. ... Maybe the owner shows it to his friends.”

That’s because the most common take is the camera-eye tour of a house, wandering around, staring at corners. Rather than do that, Ellett and Viehman came up with a story, the story of a happy family enjoying the house, a movie that when people see it they’ll say, “I want to be there and do that with my family,” Viehman said.

Opening shot: Jackson Hole Airport. Plane lands. Tetons tower in the background. Family deplanes and is driven to a neighborhood near Jackson Hole Golf and Tennis Club. They enter house. Which happens to be listed by Ellett and Viehman.

Family consists of mom and dad and kids and grandfather and grandma. At the house lots of joyful family stuff ensues, with folkie soundtrack: Everyone tours place, smiling. Grandfather visits the wine cellar. Kids dangle feet in pond. Mom and Dad wake to Teton views. There’s a cute doggie. Everyone gathers to make breakfast, breaking eggs and making pancakes. The big final scene is a 40th birthday party out on the deck.

The message isn’t house but home.

“What nobody has done before is to portray the lifestyle that goes with living in that home in Jackson Hole,” Ellett said. “This lets the buyer dream.”

Viehman and Ellett saw something similar produced by Erik Berg, an Engel & Volkers agent in Aspen, Colorado. But after seeing the 165 Huckleberry film, Berg said his Jackson colleagues had “taken it far beyond” anything he had done, Ellett said.

Ellett and Viehman started by asking themselves, “Who is going to buy this home?” The obvious answer, they acknowledged, is someone with a lot of money: The 15,000-square-foot house on two lots, with four adjoining vacant lots included, is advertised for $17.7 million.

But the immediate second thought, they said, was that it’s likely to be a second home for a good-size family, a place where people who don’t see each other all the time would come for reunions and be an important part of their memories. That led to the family movie approach.

Conceiving the movie took about two months, planning the story and the shots. A Los Angeles video firm that does commercials, including Super Bowl ads, was hired to do the work. The film was shot over two days earlier this year, using nonprofessional actors and friends, who were paid for bringing drama to real estate. The final birthday party scene required a callout for anyone who could take the time to help. Editing took about a month, including a lot of time on details like deciding just how loud the sizzling bacon should be.

Ellett said he’s seen people watch the film and “get misty.” It was viewed about 36,000 times in the first two months after it was posted, “far more than any other” such video ads, he said.

It’s also been nominated for a Golden Inman Award, given by the real estate news firm Inman. More than 300 entries were submitted in the “Best Sales and Marketing for Luxury Property” category, and the 165 Huckleberry film is one of six finalists. The winner will be revealed Oct. 17 in a ceremony in Beverly Hills. The film can be seen by going to, a site devoted to the house; a link to the film is on the right near the top of the page.)

Ellett and Viehman aren’t saying what kind of budget is required to create a “Gone With the Wind”-level real estate marketing video, but said it was a lot more than the usual. Ellett called the investment “significant.”

But having done it once, a sequel will be considerably easier and cheaper, Viehman said, if another expensive house comes on the market.

“It’s got a process now,” she said. “We’ve created an assembly line for this now, and it’s definitely something we are going to incorporate into our strategy.”

And Ellett said the movie has fans at his home, where a showing included the information that the kids in the film made $100 each for their contribution.

“My daughters are begging to be in the next movie,” he said.

Contact Mark Huffman at 732-5907 or

Mark Huffman edits copy and occasionally writes some, too. He's been a journalist since newspapers had typewriters and darkrooms.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.