Luke Lovell told the court Tuesday morning that he tried to have sex with a 13-year-old girl because he was lonely.

The Pocatello, Idaho, man said he had recently relocated to Idaho before he was caught soliciting the fictitious Jackson girl for sex.

He said his bad judgment was loneliness coupled with health issues.

“I was taking some medication and for the first time in my life I started drinking alcohol,” he said. “Bad judgment ensued, and I sincerely apologize.”

Lovell pleaded guilty Tuesday morning in Teton County District Court to one count of soliciting to engage in illicit sexual relations, a felony.

The change of plea comes three months after he pleaded not guilty.

His attorney Dick Mulligan and Teton County Prosecutor Erin Weisman settled on a plea agreement in the case that leaves sentencing discretion up to Judge Timothy Day.

Lovell turned himself into the Teton County Jail on June 27 after police said they caught him trying to have sex with “Taya Parker” on Kik, a chat app.

An undercover agent with the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation was posing as Parker.

Lovell, 38, was making arrangements to visit Teton County to have sex with Parker near the Tetons, according to court documents.

Graphic content warning: Some descriptions in the balance of this article may be disturbing. — Eds.

His texts included lewd propositions about having sex with the teen.

“If you get caught big deal, you get grounded,” Lovell told Taya. “If I get caught, I’m going to jail.”

Lovell asked the girl for a topless photo and asked if she would be interested in having a threesome, if he could record them having sex and if she would snort cocaine with him.

“There were requests for anal sex and oral sex and sexual intrusion,” Weisman said in court. “The defendant was aware that the individual was under 14.”

Lovell asked the teenager about her mom’s work schedule and about school, Weisman said.

When DCI agents intervened and interviewed Lovell in Idaho, he said he had just been joking around.

Lovell has been on house arrest since bonding out of Teton County Jail.

He’s allowed to leave for errands on Saturdays and Latter-day Saints worship on Sunday mornings, according to the court’s terms of release.

Lovell was fired from his job at Idaho State University in July, not long after he turned himself over to authorities. He worked there as an interactive video conferencing classroom specialist, according to a university representative.

Mulligan said his client is now “gainfully employed” by a call center.

Judge Day ordered a presentence investigation to be completed before Lovell’s sentencing.

But Day also questioned the plea agreement because it gives him discretion on sending Lovell to prison for two to four years or suspending the prison sentence for probation.

Day asked Mulligan and Weisman to research an old Wyoming Supreme Court opinion that Day had recently come across dealing with a judge’s authority to order probation before making a final judgment in a case.

“You are never too old to learn,” Day said. “I was enlightened by reading that case.”

Before the next hearing, which will likely be in a few months, Day said, “I would suggest that counsel review that case and confer and I will be doing the same.”

Day said the plea agreement could hinge on whether he and the attorneys agree on their interpretation of the Wyoming Supreme Court opinion on deferring sentences.

This version of the article removes the word "Mormon" from the headline and replaces it with "Idaho." Although Lovell's lawyer used his religion as part of his defense, upon further reflection, editors decided that including that detail in the web version's headline was unnecessary. — Eds.

Contact Emily Mieure at 732-7066 or courts@jhnewsandguide.com.

(9) comments

Johanna Love Staff
Johanna Love

We appreciate feedback from readers on everything from the content of articles and headlines to word choice. Upon further reflection, editors decided that despite Lovell's lawyer using his religion as part of his defense, using "Mormon" in the web version of this headline was unnecessary and could be interpreted as excoriating an entire religion.

Maury Jones

I am also very offended that you used the description "Mormon" in the headline. Do you also list Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, Presbyterian, Jewish, etc, when you report on a sex offender? What this man did would get him excommunicated from the Mormon Church. What he did is so offensive to a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints that we would not consider him a "Mormon". We are offended that you made an issue of his religion.

Tim Rieser

New low for the news and guide. Plastering “Morman” is bizarrely biased for no good reason. I’m never a defender of organized religion. I’m an atheist. And there is no argument that any religion has the high moral ground over another religion. In fact, there’s no evidence that being religious leads to higher morals than being non-religious. So why the headline when his religion never enters the narrative once? Shame on author Mieure and editor. As I said, new low for the NAG and personal first for me defending any organized religion for any reason.

David Weingart

Some people need a LOT of psychological help.

Sandy Ress

Why did you use the word "Mormon" in this article?

Rebecca Huntington Staff
Rebecca Huntington

The reason that we included the man’s religion is that it was used in court to grant him an exception to his house arrest. Because of his religion, he is allowed to attend worship every Sunday morning. We regularly report exceptions to house arrest that let the community know when a suspect is allowed to be out in the community and where.

Zach Jones

Pathetic. But the headline doesn’t have the context of your response here!

I look forward to other adjectives being used not just in stories, but in headlines, such as “illegal,” “atheist,” “democrat,” etc.

jeff muratore

So we are to believe if this person said they wanted to attend their local Mosque you would have titled the article with "Muslim"? I don't think so...

Zach Jones

Great question.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.