Grizzly hunt

The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission decided not to take advantage of a new state law that would allow state wildlife officials to hunt grizzlies in violation of the federal Endangered Species Act.

Wyoming wildlife officials opted last week not to hunt grizzly bears in violation of the Endangered Species Act, citing the federal government’s legal supremacy.

Deliberations of a prospective grizzly bear hunt came at the behest of the Wyoming Legislature, which passed a bill last session that authorized state wildlife officials to hunt grizzlies in spite of the species’ “threatened” federal status. The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission had that discussion last week, unanimously deciding not to direct the Wyoming Game and Fish Department to draw up hunting regulations.

Commissioner Patrick Crank, a Cheyenne attorney, explained to his fellow board members that 230 years of case law supported the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which establishes the precedence of federal laws over state law.

“The Endangered Species Act, sometimes unfortunately, it is the law of the land in regard to endangered species,” Crank said April 24 in Riverton. “If we were to exercise our discretion, as directed by the Legislature to enact a hunting season, we could do that, I guess.

“But the practical effect of that is we would throw our citizens into an untenable situation, which I don’t feel comfortable doing as a commissioner,” he said. “We [could] put someone who bought one of those licenses and went out and killed a grizzly bear in harm’s way, because the federal government will prosecute that person and stick them in jail.”

Widely viewed as symbolic, the Legislature’s passage of Senate File 93 was born from frustration about litigation that has kept the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s grizzlies under federal control years after recovery criteria were met. Twice in the last dozen years the 700 or so bears estimated to live in the region have been “delisted.” But both times, including in 2018, successful lawsuits have restored Endangered Species Act protections, precluding a hunt.

Reps. Jim Roscoe, I-Teton, Sublette, Lincoln, and Andy Schwartz, D-Teton, and Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Teton, voted for the bill, while Rep. Mike Yin, D-Teton, opposed it.

Five days after Gov. Mark Gordon signed the bill into law, environmental advocacy groups announced their intent to sue. Erik Molvar, who directs one of the groups that signed on, Western Watersheds Project, said that because of the commission’s decision a lawsuit is no longer necessary.

“Since the state of Wyoming is not moving forward with the grizzly bear hunt,” Molvar said, “they are in compliance with the Endangered Species Act, and everybody should be happy.”

Before the commission voted, Game and Fish biologists presented information to help commissioners decide whether two conditions from the legislation were met that could justify a grizzly hunt. According to the state statute, those factors are whether grizzly hunting would benefit Wyoming’s other wildlife and if hunting would make Wyoming workers, citizens and tourists safer.

Discussing the effects of grizzly predation, Game and Fish carnivore biologist Dan Bjornlie said that grizzlies are a major predator of fawn and calf elk, deer and moose in the spring. But research has found that some grizzlies don’t eat young, vulnerable ungulates at all, he said, and the bears that do have a brief, two-week window before elk calves and deer fawns grow and are too fast to catch.

There are many environmental complexities that make it difficult to say precisely how grizzlies affect an ungulate population, he said, especially in areas with several species of large carnivores.

“It makes it difficult for the department to ... say, ‘All we have to do is X, [and] we can reduce the bear population here and we’ll have better hunting and a higher elk population,’” Bjornlie said.

Game and Fish’s large carnivore supervisor Dan Thompson took on the topic of human safety. As grizzlies expand into the more developed fringes of the ecosystem, conflicts with people are more likely, he said. On average, four to five humans are injured annually by grizzlies in the region.

“Grizzly bears are inherently aggressive,” Thompson said. “There is a natural aggression we see in [Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem] grizzly bears. There’s not much of a flight response, it’s more fight.”

Commissioners unanimously agreed that the legislation’s criteria justifying a hunt were met.

“I feel very comfortable making a finding that grizzly bears — not solely but cumulatively with the other predators we have in Northwest Wyoming — are having an impact on other wildlife populations,” Crank said.

The Game and Fish Commission’s no-vote on pushing forward with a hunting season was possible because the new state law is permissive, using “may” in its language and not “shall.”

Before moving on, Commissioner David Rael, of Cody, asked Crank why individual states were able to legalize marijuana, when it’s classified as an illegal controlled substance under federal law.

“That debate is still ongoing,” Crank said. “The federal government just chose not to come in and enforce the federal law. I suspect that the decision whether to prosecute someone who caps a grizzly bear will be much easier than [with] a dope smoker in Colorado.”

Rael said he knew marijuana was a bad comparison, but that it was a valid point he needed to make.

“I don’t want to go against the federal government,” he said. “I know the Endangered Species Act is something we will adhere to.”

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067 or env@jhnewsandguide.com.

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them for 7 years. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

(9) comments

Leslie Patten

I watched this discussion on youtube. Commissioner Crank grossly misstated cow/calf ratios in Sunlight Basin where I live as an example of grizzly predation. First, he stated cow/calf ratios were still low, using a figure of 10/100. When Arthur Middleton did his 3 year study in Sunlight Basin in 2008-2011, those numbers were about 12/100. Two years ago the cow/calf ratio had risen to 19/100, still low but doing much better. Commissioner Crank also misstated that these numbers were low because of bear and wolf predation in Sunlight. That is a false statement, and not the conclusion of Middleton's in-depth study. Middleton's study concluded that habitat and compressed green-up were causing elk cows to have calves every other year instead of every year. The September 2017 statewide elk survey showed our state's elk herds at or above objective in all but 2 herds--one of them being Sunlight (called Clarks Fork) Our herd has grown nicely and is almost at objective in that count--2633 out of 3000 objective. For Commissioner Crank to base his vote on old information, erroneous information, and hearsay without considering the science is more than disheartening. The Game and Fish commissioners are responsible for our wildlife. Their decisions have repercussions far and wide. Their decisions should, and must, be based on the best science available, not what they want to believe.

Ken Chison

Leslie. If I remember correctly Middleton did say that initially, 4 out of 5 cows were pregnant, but later on in the year, only 1 in 10 had a calf with it. This is when the narrative was solely due to the decline of cutthroat trout from the illegal introduction of lake trout by the park service. So I do believe Crank was spot on with the numbers given. Although I do not remember the mention of compressed green up, which may have been a later study.

Chad guenter

As long as the bears aren't hunted, expect a yearly rise in human/bear conflicts and the bear mortality numbers to go with it. Bears are going to die at the hands of humans with or without the hunt. This isn't even mentioning the bear on bear deaths due to habitat saturation.

Jay Westemeier

Although I basically agree with what you said, the same thing applies to just about every wildlife species. In the case of Grizzlies, hunting is not going to change any of the things you mentioned. It's a waist of time.

Chad guenter

The bears were DELISTED.

Terry Milan

Delisted means they are no longer considered endangered, the courts have determined that they are protected. This is logical if you smoke whatever they have in Washington.

Chad guenter

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service delists an animal THEY oversee the population of, and a politically biased man in a Robe "decides" to relist them. The US Federal "Just-Us" system at work.

Leslie Patten

Chad, the "man in the Robe", if you read his decision, based his decision on what USF&W laid out as their initial goals for delisting, which was to have connected populations in the GYE and the NCDE for genetic diversity. Since the USF&W did not meet their own requirements, but politics rushed them to delist a separate population, he just threw it back at them and said to meet their stated objectives.

Just one other point is that hunting bears is not going to do anything but reduce the bear population. It won't target problem bears. And I doubt it will solve conflicts, which are because of 1. humans and their food sources and 2. reduced grizzly bear food sources such as white bark pine nuts in the fall which were keeping bears high up before the trees all died.

Jay Westemeier

Although this decision will not be popular with a small percentage of the population, it is the logical and most responsible direction at this time. Opening the door to federal litigation would have been a disease that the state legislature and hunters would have regretted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
If you share a web address, please provide context as to why you posted the link.