Nature and wildlife photographer Tom Mangelsen shooting near Oxbow Bend in Grand Teton National Park.

Nature and wildlife photographer Tom Mangelsen won one of 22 tags to hunt a grizzly bear this fall. Mangelsen, who drew tag number 8 in the draw announced Thursday, said he does not plan to use the tag to harvest a grizzly bear.

The second person who will have the option of hunting grizzly bears near Jackson Hole this fall has no intention of shooting and killing one of the bruins, anti-hunting activists say.

Jackson wildlife photographer Tom Mangelsen made a splash in the news around the world last week when he beat long odds, drawing No. 8 on an “issuance list” that will allow up to 10 grizzly hunters, one at a time, into the field starting Sept. 15. But another Jackson resident is actually better positioned, and drew the No. 2 spot on the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s list.

“She’s going to go out and shoot them with a camera,” said Ann Smith, a longtime Jackson resident and conservationist who helped spring the “Shoot ’Em With a Camera” campaign.

The successful applicant’s identity is public information, though the News&Guide is choosing not to name her or other hunters who lucked out in the draw. Manglesen identified himself.The woman did not respond to requests for an interview.

The Shoot ’Em group’s tactic was to attract nonhunters to apply for Wyoming’s first grizzly hunting season in 44 years. It appears the nonhunting cohort was awarded at least two licenses.

“We know we have two, and we hope we have more,” said Judy Hofflund, one of the organizers. “We have no way of knowing how many licenses we got. I wish there was a way of knowing.”

One successful applicant the movement’s five women founders don’t have to wonder about is Mangelsen, who learned of his fortune from colleague Sue Cedarholm on Thursday morning.

“When Sue told me that I got No. 8, I about fell off my chair,” Mangelsen said. “I just thought, ‘How can that be possible?’”

He was up against 3,500 Wyoming residents and 2,327 nonresidents vying for a shot at the tags valid where most of Wyoming’s grizzlies roam. Another 948 residents and 530 nonresidents applied to hunt in “hunt area 7,” on the peripheries of the greater Yellowstone area where relatively fewer bears are found. It’s unclear if any nonhunters were awarded licenses for that area.

Wyoming wildlife managers say the activists’ tactics are legal, though they’re not thrilled that it’s taking away opportunities from hunters.

“Definitely, we have no problem welcoming anybody who buys a license,” Wyoming Game and Fish Department spokesman Renny MacKay said.

If Wyoming’s hunt isn’t first snagged by a lawsuit, the most effective way for activists to disrupt it, ironically, will be to compel their camera-toting followers to actually lethally shoot a bear. Once a female grizzly is killed by a licensed hunter, the season ceases.

Smith has conferred with the Jackson resident who is No. 2 on the issuance list, and a purposely killed female, she said, is not in the cards.

“She would never do that,” Smith said. “She’s horrified at the whole idea.”

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067, env@jhnewsandguide.com or @JHNGenviro.

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Jeff Larson

Mangelsen is a clown.

dave johnson

This is good news for people on both sides of the coin. For the anti-hunters, the odds have been reduced for the chances of a grizzly being harvested. For the pro hunters, there has just been a large contribution for wildlife conservation and hopefully monies will go towards game management in general, but for education to all for the reasons and needs for game management...

Glenn Graham

Correcting the IGBST and WGF misinformation campaign led by its pro-hunting cronies, and showing that there is no scientific justification to kill the small, isolated group of Yellowstone grizzlies would be a good use of the funds.

dave johnson

Absolutely... It dose require monies for research. As a hunter and wildlife photographer, I am all for getting documented statistics. Again this cost money. I am happy to see the non hunters starting to contribute monies towards game management research.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the "Report" link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.