Wyoming is already in charge of its wolves, but U.S. Sen. John Barrasso has set out to ensure that the courts can’t ever jeopardize the state’s jurisdiction.

His congressional counterparts, so far, agree.

A delisting provision prohibiting legal challenges of wolf delisting in Wyoming, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan is bundled with Barrasso’s Hunting Heritage and Environmental Legacy Preservation for Wildlife Act, dubbed the HELP Act. The legislation passed committee 14-to-7 on July 26, but not before Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., failed to quash what some call an end run around the Endangered Species Act.

“I have a strong interest in preserving the publicly informed, science-driven process that currently exists for making endangered species determinations,” Carper told fellow legislators at a Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works meeting last week. “And I’m not sure that legislatively delisting species is consistent with that interest.”

Carper’s amendment was shot down.

In addition to prohibiting legal challenges, the HELP Act also automatically returns wolf management to the Great Lakes states, where about 3,500 of the large canines roam.

The 300-some wolves in Wyoming have been under state jurisdiction since a U.S. Court of Appeals decided this spring to overturn a 2014 decision that sided with environmental groups.

Barrasso pointed out that his bill has bipartisan support, including that of Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

“The Obama administration’s Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf in Wyoming and the western Great Lakes only to be dragged through seemingly never ending court processes,” Barrasso said. “These sections [of the bill] put those species’ management back where they always belonged, in the hands of the state.”

The provisions, Barrasso pointed out, do not prohibit Fish and Wildlife from promulgating future rules listing the gray wolf as threatened or endangered.

Some wildlife advocacy groups have staunchly opposed the HELP Act and criticized the delisting rider. Defenders of Wildlife President and CEO Jamie Rappaport Clark dubbed the HELP Act a “misnomer.”

“No matter how many sweeteners are added,” Clark said in a statement, “defending the integrity of our bedrock environmental laws such as the Endangered Species Act should be the number one priority in a Congress marked by chaos and attacks on our most basic environmental protections.”

Barrasso’s camp said in a press release that over 50 conservation groups, including the National Wildlife Federation, support the act.

The wolf stipulations are packaged in legislation to reauthorize and fund the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Act, Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act and Chesapeake Bay restoration programs. It backs expansion of public shooting ranges and clarifies baiting rules for waterfowl hunters.

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067, env@jhnewsandguide.com or @JHNGenviro.

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them since 2012. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Sam Lobo

The abuse of the Endangered Species Act by these disgusting groups that pimp wolves to no end needs to stop. 19 trillion in debt and this is where these hideous groups want to spend Federal tax dollars????? Ohhh that's right they get paid big bucks to pull the hogwash that they do..... Here is a list of JUST four of the countless lawsuits and the EAJA dollars paid to these rich welfare environmental lawyers.

*Defenders of Wildlife v. Hall USFWS, 1:08-cv-56 (D. Mont.) - $263,099.66 Wolf Challenge against the USFWS's 2008 decision to delist the northern Rockies.

*Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Dep of Int, 1:03-cv-1348 (D. Ore.) - $272,710.54 Down listing" of the gray wolf from endangered to threatened status.

*National Wildlife Federation v. Norton, 1:03-CV-340 (D. Vt.) - $255,500 Wolf argument over Distinct population segments

*Humane Society of the U S v. Kempthorne USFWS, 1:07-cv-0677 (D.D.C.) - $280,000 Western Great lakes delisting

The million dollars listed above is only a small percentage of what the cottage industry has made in the process weakening the Endangered Species Act...and does not include the cost of defending the suit OR court costs. YOU see, these social leaches know that they can sue for an animal like the wolf knowing that it will never be able to be put back into "the majority of their former range” without doing irreparable harm to wolves.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
.
The News&Guide welcomes comments from our paid subscribers. Tell us what you think. Thanks for engaging in the conversation!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.