A proposal to renovate Grand Targhee Resort and expand its federal land lease area by nearly 50% has not gained much support among residents who have taken the time to weigh in.

The Caribou-Targhee National Forest is “scoping” the proposal to grow the resort into Teton Canyon and has asked the public to send comments and concerns by Monday. As of early this week, 125 letters had been posted to the national forest’s database. The large majority of people who have taken part have expressed reservations about the plan to modernize the ski area, which is seated along the Teton Range’s west slope.

“There are enough overcrowded resorts,” Edoardo Guerra wrote to the national forest. “Targhee’s charm is in its simplicity and purity. Please do not proceed with the expansion.”

“Over time,” he said, “the path of responsible stewardship will bring more value and rewards.”

The Caribou-Targhee is also hearing from people championing the 64-year-old ski area’s renovation plans. Driggs resident Darin Herzof wrote, contending that the positives easily outweigh the negatives.

“The economy of Teton Valley relies on tourist money and Targhee is a huge driver of that,” Herzof said. “Expansion means more money, it means more jobs, it means more local tax dollars, it means more investment of dollars back into the local community.”

Grand Targhee Resort’s plans call for adding 1,200 acres to the ski area’s current 2,517-acre permit area on the forest. The new acreage is split into two similar-sized Teton Canyon expansion zones to the south and west, which are being dubbed the “South Bowl Pod” and “Mono Trees Pod.” Together they would be served by four new ski lifts and have nearly 280 acres of cleared runs.

Other changes sought by the resort include rebuilt and all-new lifts within the current boundary, a tubing park, a guest yurt, 29 miles of new trails, 5.6 miles of new roads, a zip line, a ropes course and an aerial adventure course. Snowmaking would be expanded by 57 acres, and new on-slope restaurants would be located at the summit of Fred’s Mountain and at the top of the Sacajawea Lift. If the expansions and infrastructure were all approved and built, Grand Targhee forecasts that its “comfortable carrying capacity” would more than double, increasing from 3,000 to 7,000 skiers.

Many commenters cited environmental issues while encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to scale back the plans or scrap them altogether. Holly Guerra, who identified herself as a lifelong local Targhee skier, was worried about light pollution, aesthetics, sewage disposal and the effect on wildlife populations, such as the Teton Range’s bighorn sheep.

Greg Collins also opposed the proposed Teton Canyon expansion partly on the grounds of bighorn sheep impacts, and he attached a 2019 photo of two bighorn rams close to the proposed South Bowl connector lift to prove his point.

“The cliffy south face of Teton Canyon is priceless habitat,” Collins wrote to the forest. “I have seen grizzly bear, bighorn sheep, moose, long-eared owl, northern goshawk, sharp-shinned hawk, migrating warblers, wolverine, pine marten and many other species on the south slopes of Peaked and Mary’s Nipple. Families of black bear are gorging on chokecherry right now.”

Teton County, Wyoming, commissioners are among the commenters, although at this juncture elected officials have not weighed in on the substance of Targhee’s plans. Their letter is about a request to join the National Environmental Policy Act planning process as a “cooperating agency.”

Cattle rancher Clyde Waddell shared worries about the effect on the Caribou-Targhee’s Mill Creek and Teton grazing allotments, where his stock graze from mid-June to the end of September. Impacts, he said, were “numerous and serious.”

“It is difficult to conceive of how the new Grand Targhee Resort activities and cattle grazing could coexist on the same piece of forest acreage,” Waddell’s missive stated.

Documents about Targhee’s proposed expansion and renovation, and instructions on how to comment are posted online at TinyURL.com/TargheeExpansion.

Comments are supposed to be addressed in a draft environmental impact statement expected out by January. That document is being prepared by a Grand Targhee consultant, SE Group, which is working in coordination with the Forest Service. A final EIS and draft decision are expected in October 2021 and a final decision by January or February 2022.

Concurrently, the Caribou-Targhee will be pursuing an amendment to its forest plan. As it stands the proposed expansion areas are located on land that currently has a “visual quality maintenance” management emphasis and is off limits to development.

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067 or env@jhnewsandguide.com.

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them since 2012. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
As of Oct. 18, 2020, the News&Guide has shifted to a subscriber-only commenting policy. You can read about this decision on our About Us page. Thanks for engaging in the conversation!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.