A new report has identified 26,000 square miles of unoccupied wolf habitat in Wyoming, including large expanses of the Wyoming and Wind River ranges and all of the Bighorn and Medicine Bow mountains.

The analysis, headed by the Center for Biological Diversity, is a synthesis of more than two dozen research papers that have attempted to label potential wolf habitat. Today, south of the Canadian border, gray wolves are found on only about a tenth of their historic range.

“It shows that the current wolf population of 5,400 could be nearly doubled if federal protections were retained and recovery efforts began to restore wolves to some of the places they once called home,” the Center for Biological Diversity wrote in a statement.

Factors included in author Amaroq Weiss’ habitat model include human population density, prey density, land use and ownership, livestock density, prey availability and other measures of what’s necessary and suitable for a large far-ranging carnivore.

The report identified 359,000 square miles of vacant gray wolf habitat spread across 19 states. Colorado, New England, California and the Pacific Northwest account for the largest chunks of habitat where wolves have been extirpated.

Wyoming’s former management plan puts a focus on retaining wolves in the state’s northwest corner. Prior to being stripped of control by recent court ruling, Wyoming managers had purposefully attempted to eliminate the large carnivores from everywhere except the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Weiss, the Center for Biological Diversity’s West Coast wolf organizer, explained the distinction between the state’s definition of wolf habitat and what’s modeled in her report.

“The report analyzes 27 different peer-reviewed papers,” Weiss said. “It’s not our original research.

“I’m assuming that people that did those research papers were looking at a broader set of parameters than the managers on the ground,” she said.

The boundaries of Wyoming’s trophy game area — where wolves are protected — were set to exclude areas that have potential for chronic conflicts with livestock.

Weiss said that where livestock roam is one of many components to the wolf habitat equation.

“It is one of many considerations,” she said. “That’s a people factor.

“Across the West there are many ranchers that are wanting to share the land with native predators,” Weiss said. “Ranchers are wanting to be certified as predator-friendly because they understand that the public is in favor of having them on the landscape.”

Ken Mills, a Wyoming Game and Fish Department wolf program biologist, said he doesn’t anticipate that wolves will disperse any differently now that they are not being hunted legally anywhere in the Equality State.

“Wolves are going to disperse, and they’re going to continue to find ways to move around,” Mills said in an interview last week. “They’re going to find their way to the Bighorns.”

Because wolves are now protected, Mills said he anticipates that dispersing animals will persist for longer in now unoccupied places, such as the Bighorns, and that they will begin to kill livestock and then have to be killed.

“The predator zone is designed to limit the establishment and the damage that usually come from wolves establishing territories,” he said. “And it’s worked.”

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them for 7 years. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Jason M

Let them Disperse...back into their Natural territories. It has already been proven that Farmers/Ranchers... CAN Co-Exist very will with Wolves. There are many simple steps they can take to seriously lower any Livestock losses...and those Steps are not costly. Defenders of Wildlife, has some great proven examples of just that.
It has also been Scientifically and Ecologically shown that Wolves control their own populations based upon available Prey and Territory. It takes time to occur naturally...and it is our Duty as Stewards of this Planet...to let them do so.
We have tinkered so much with the Natural world...and the Wolves are another perfect example of just that. We must let them be...they (presuming they are not ill or rabid) do NOT Kill People...and the Livestock Losses have always been exaggerated to make the Wolf look guilty...no matte what did the killing..which was generally...NOT a Wolf.
I Implore you...Let the Wolves...be Wolves... !!!
Thank you for your Time,

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.