Town Square Tavern

The Fifth Judicial District Court dismissed a malpractice case against a Jackson lawyer, who the former Town Square Tavern owners say advised them to submit false information on an application to renew their liquor license.

The former owners of Town Square Tavern first lost their liquor license for submitting false information on an application to renew it and now have lost their case against the lawyer they say led them astray.

The Mattheis Company, owned by brothers Steve and Mike Mattheis, operated the tavern for a decade at the site of what is now Roadhouse Brewing’s downtown pub, until the Town Council revoked the tavern’s liquor license in 2017.

That revocation came after officials discovered the company had incorrectly stated on its license renewal application that it had a lease on the building for the yearlong duration of the license, a requirement under Wyoming law. In reality the lease was set to expire after six months.

Since then the brothers have tried unsuccessfully to have the decision overturned, arguing that it was an innocent mistake and that they submitted the application under the guidance of legal counsel. But both the Teton County District Court and the Wyoming Supreme Court agreed they should have known better after years of filing such applications.

The brothers also filed suit against their attorney, Richard Mulligan of Mulligan Law Office, for legal malpractice. They allege he advised them to submit the unlawful application, breaching his duty to his clients.

But Judge Bill Simpson of the state’s 5th Judicial District Court ruled earlier this month to dismiss the case against Mulligan, saying the previous ruling by the Teton County District Court invalidated the brothers’ claim that they relied on his counsel.

With no local case law to inform his thinking, Judge Timothy Day of that court looked to a case from West Virginia, Powers v. Goodwin. Based on that decision, for that defense to be viable clients must have made a complete disclosure of facts to their attorney and asked for legal advice. Then the attorney must have told them it was legal.

On those points Day found he could not “discern with affirmative evidence the scope of the legal services.”

But the bottom line is that even if the evidence did show Mulligan had advised them it was legal to submit the application as they did, Day decided he could not be sure the Mattheis brothers relied on that advice in good faith, truly believing their actions were legal.

Because of that initial ruling, the 5th Judicial District Court found that the brothers could not raise the issue again, citing the principle of “collateral estoppel,” which essentially prevents relitigation of any issue that a court has previously ruled on.

The Mattheis Company was seeking damages for the loss of its liquor license — which it valued at $300,000 — the loss of “valuable business at the Tavern,” and attorney fees.

Contact Cody Cottier at 732-5911 or

Cody Cottier covers town and state government. He grew up with a view of the Olympic Mountains, and after graduating Washington State University he traded it for a view of the Tetons. Odds are the mountains are where you’ll find him when not on deadline.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.