This week, I had another column ready to go.

But in light of the recent mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, I want to instead revisit the case for some common sense reforms on firearms.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 39,773 people died from gunshot wounds in 2017 in the United States — over 100 every day. Since 1970 more Americans have died from guns than in all our wars put together. The Dayton shooting was the 251st mass shooting in the past 216 days.

For all of my adult life I have been a gun owner. Like most Americans, I think some responsibilities go along with the right to own and use guns. Though it may not seem like it from the lack of progress to date, there is overwhelming common ground in the United States on firearm regulation reform.

Most Americans support gun ownership by law-abiding adults — 87% for to 11% against, with the rest undecided — but strong majorities here in the West and most law enforcement agencies also favor reasonable restrictions to go with gun ownership. Unfortunately, majority rule does not seem to apply.

Completion of universal background checks for all gun sales is supported by almost everyone — 88%, with only 6% against and others undecided. Currently, most private sales can proceed without a check.

Including private firearms transactions in the background check process, supported by 90%, would close a loophole on millions of gun purchases. Today any gun sale can proceed if the background check is not complete in three days.

Those who are on Social Security disability for mental health need to be included in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System database so they cannot legally buy guns.

People who are on the suspected terrorist no-fly list definitely need to be in the NICS system so they cannot legally buy guns. That is supported by 70% Americans, versus 20% against.

The FBI terrorist watch list contains just over 100,000 people. Only about 2,700 are American citizens. I really do not understand the objection to restricting gun purchases by suspected terrorists.

By the same measure — 70% for compared with 20% against — Americans favor limiting the capacity of magazines.

Most proposals and some existing state regulations require a 10-round limit, which is still a lot. Since the federal ban on high-capacity magazines expired in 2004, civilian sales have skyrocketed. The Dayton shooter is said to have used a 100-round magazine, which is now coming on the market.

Congress recently loosened restrictions on the CDC using federal public health funds to study gun violence, but money has not been appropriated for the work. Basic science and knowledge would help us to get this right.

Enforcing existing laws to prohibit gun sales to fugitives from justice, as well as convicted spouse and child abusers, is supported by 84% of Americans.

Secure gun storage is the standard for responsible gun owners. Requiring it for all is supported by 76% of Americans. Gun violence restraining orders by law enforcement agencies can remove firearms from individuals deemed unstable. A mandatory waiting period of three days for gun purchases is supported by 78% of Americans, with 14 percent against.

Those reasonable measures can be legislated and implemented nationally with little impact on responsible law-abiding gun owners. Gun deaths are much lower in states and nations that have adopted those measures. While they will not end all gun-related violence, they will result in fewer gun deaths to our children and others in America.

The American people and our elected leaders have not been able to come together to have a conversation on gun violence that leads to progress. We have failed to live up to the standards of reasoned deliberation that should be the soul of American civic discourse. If we see ourselves as enemies and not countrymen and -women, we will not solve problems together.

Paul Hansen is a gun owner who thinks that reasonable restrictions on firearms will save lives. Columns are solely the opinion of their authors. Contact him via

Recommended for you

(3) comments

William Addeo

We are reaching a point with hate speech where the determining party of hate speech are the true haters. If you disagree with this paper, they will delete you if you are too effective. Everybody knows this to be true and it's time someone start a real paper in town. There must be at least one billionaire who isn't anti-American. If anyone has the money, I'll do it!

William Addeo

Criminals don't obey the law. Liberals always want to punish innocent citizens for something a criminal does. It's like castrating you because your neighbor has too many kids.

The news deleted my last comment. I'm just to honest with the facts and kill the story completely so there is no debate, only gun grabbing.

William Addeo

How about talking about illegal immigration of criminals with no background checks? For that matter no checks what so ever of millions of people coming in illegally? 300 kids a week die from drug overdose. Alcoholism kills hundreds of thousands a year including car accidents. We spend $2 billion a day on military defense. We have 30,000 American soldiers on the Korean border protecting them. How about bringing them home to protect America from illegal invasion? 20,000 laws on the books already on guns. Gun control is people control. Why do gun grabbers always want to punish innocent people for the crimes of others. It's like castrating you because your neighbor has too many kids. By the way, the shooter in El Paso was latino and they make him out to be a white supremacist? Fake news is all about disarming American citizens. Basically, this article seems like you are being logical. If you talked about how many crimes are stopped because of guns and the stupid labeling of guns as assault weapons, maybe you would sound more sensible. The gun issue is really a diversionary tactic to divide America and lead us to a civil war. Racism is the leading factor of the fake news mafia. Imagine if Obama was treated like the haters are treating President Trump? Just what do you call antifa? It's left wing domestic terrorist organization. We need less gun control and more border control.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.