St. John's Medical Center

After a robust conversation Tuesday afternoon, the St. John’s Medical Center Board of Trustees approved a new full name for the hospital.

The hospital plans to transition to “St. John’s Health” by July 1.

Trustees wanted to reassure those in the room that the hospital would always be named “St. John’s” but that just the descriptor is changing.

“I do like the fact that when people think of St. John’s and this new descriptor, the descriptor is much more about the entire process of wellness,” CEO Dr. Paul Beaupre said. “I really do not want St. John’s to be thought of anymore as where people go to get help when they’re sick. We’re much bigger than that now.”

Most trustees loved the new name. Liz Masek said, “I think we need to be forward thinking. St. John’s Health is this big thing we provide everyone, from education to outreach to specialized services.”

Others pointed to hospitals with similar names, like University of Utah Health.

Dr. Bruce Hayse appeared a bit more lukewarm.

“It certainly works and is a very acceptable term now,” he said. “But I’m not excited about it.”

Although the name ended up being approved unanimously, Trustee Joe Albright voiced concerns and tried, but failed, to extend the discussion another month.

He said it might be confusing to say the ambulance is taking a patient to “St. John’s Health” and said that the string of adjectives with no noun wasn’t the best possible name.

After some disagreement, Beaupre appealed to the board to follow the process they approved and let the branding research speak for itself.The shift is part of the hospital’s broader branding evolution process that began in the fall and will include other changes like a new logo and communication strategies.

“In reality, the benefits reach far beyond the name,” said Karen Connelly, chief communications officer.

“The real value is in the insights we gained and in our opportunity to use that information to do an even better job at what we do every day to serve the community,” she wrote in an email.

Two consulting firms used in the perceptions research and branding effort cost the hospital just under $75,000 over the past two years. Anticipated expenses associated with changing the name, such as replacing the logo on signs, materials and more, are in the process of being determined and will be better defined in March. Connelly said that to reduce and spread out costs, not all the materials will be changed at once.

“Some signage is likely to be a priority,” Connelly said. “We don’t have a cost estimate yet, but we’ll have that info as the budget process gets going.”

Contact Kylie Mohr at 732-7079, health@jhnewsandguide.com or @JHNGhealth.

Kylie Mohr covers the education and health beats. Mohr grew up in Washington and came to Wyoming via Georgetown. She loves seeing the starry night sky again.

(2) comments

Chad guenter

"Branding/marketing/logos/etc." the focus of modern AmeriKan healthcare.

Healing/caring/CURING take a backseat to $$$$$$ from coast to coast. And idiots want to make it even worse by handing it over to government to run.

Dave Valley

A total waste of money, and it costs plenty to change a name. I have no problem with the new name but what was the emergency? Branding? Please. If we have all this extra money at SJMC,, then maybe they should pay their housekeeping staff more.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.
If you share a web address, please provide context as to why you posted the link.