The first golden eagle marked and followed for research in Yellowstone National Park’s history lasted only about four months before a common human-caused source of death did the bird in.

The adult female, captured in August, was being studied by University of Montana graduate student David Haines. On Dec. 6, she turned up dead, discovered near Phantom Lake in Yellowstone’s Blacktail Plateau, said Todd Katzner, an adviser to the study and a research wildlife biologist for the U.S. Geological Survey’s Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center.

“The focus of the research is on local breeders and understanding their behaviors and the threats they face,” Katzner said. “We very quickly found out one of the threats they face.”

In recent years, Katzner said, wildlife scientists have enhanced their understanding of lead poisoning’s impact on eagles and other scavengers. It’s now known that hunter-killed carcasses are a chief cause of lead exposure and the reason for seasonal fluctuations in blood-lead levels in animals that scavenge carcasses, especially avian species.

Gut piles and carcasses left behind from late-season Montana elk hunts along Yellowstone’s northern boundary were likely a factor in the golden eagle’s death, Yellowstone officials wrote in a Monday press release.

“Transmitter data revealed that the eagle ranged extensively during the 2018 autumn hunting season north of the park before it died,” the statement said. “The lead levels in the marked eagle indicated it likely ate carrion that contained lead fragments.”

The research group Craighead Beringia South, based out of Kelly, is running a parallel study of Montana golden eagles and partnering on the park project, which now follows six tracked golden eagles.

Out of 30 golden eagles Beringia South has monitored over the years with GPS equipment, two have died from lead poisoning, research biologist Ross Crandall said.

“That’s two of five confirmed mortalities for our study,” Crandall said. “It’s substantial.”

The female golden found dead at Phantom Lake registered a 48 parts per million “dry weight” reading of lead in her liver. That’s “well over lethal toxicity,” according to Yellowstone’s statement, and compares to a natural level that would “probably” be below 5 parts per million, Crandall said.

Some land managers, like Grand Teton National Park, have required big game hunters to use nonlead ammunition to prevent lead poisoning of scavengers. Nationwide, lead is banned for waterfowl hunting to reduce its impacts on ducks and other bottom-feeding wildlife. California became the first state to ban lead ammo for all types of hunting.

More broad-based reforms have run into political opposition and failed. In early 2017, then-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe announced a complete ban on lead ammunition and fishing tackle on national wildlife refuges, which would have changed the rules on the National Elk Refuge, a major draw for scavenging bald eagles during late-fall hunts.

But when President Trump’s first interior secretary, Ryan Zinke, took over later that year he promptly reversed the policy change, permitting lead ammo.

Contact Mike Koshmrl at 732-7067 or

Mike has reported on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem's wildlife, wildlands and the agencies that manage them for 7 years. A native Minnesotan, he arrived in the West to study environmental journalism at the University of Colorado.

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Chad guenter

There is ZERO facts in this article other than a dead eagle and lead toxicity. Where the lead came from is pure speculation. It could be from fishing tackle, or upland game birds that were shot with lead shot.

One more attempted anti-big game hunting Propaganda hit piece, by Koshmrl..

Sam Campbell

I would consider transmitter data showing that the eagle spent a lot time just north of the park during elk season in that area a relevant fact. Fishing tackle is of course a possibility, and one of many good arguments to stop using lead in that application, too. Knowing what I know now about the effects of lead exposure, I would love to have not spent my childhood biting lead split-shot. Not sure where you get the impression that Mike is anti big game hunting. Seems like a strange stance for someone who spends a bunch of time big game hunting. There is a big difference between recognizing that there are better ways to do things and being against them being done. Non-lead ammunition for hunting is an easy way to reduce our impact on other wildlife species, and the downsides that have existed in the past have largely been eliminated. Non lead big game ammo is now priced in the same range as other premium factory ammo. Costs are similar to quality lead bullets if you hand load. Performance on game is well proven. Why so much resistance to change?

rich quinlan

Jeff , I hate wind turbines , ugly , make me dizzy , but its the cats man , the dang cats you gotta be worried about , Wind turbines kill between 214,000 and 368,000 birds annually — a small fraction compared with the estimated 6.8 million fatalities from collisions with cell and radio towers and the 1.4 billion to 3.7 billion deaths from cats, according to the peer-reviewed study by two federal scientists and the environmental ...Sep 15, 2014

jeff muratore

But no apparent concern for hundreds of eagles kill by wind turbines?

rich quinlan

When hunters wonder why they seemingly are getting bad reputations you have to ask why are yall still using lead. We all have known for what , 40 years now of the harm that lead does to wildlife.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please note: Online comments may also run in our print publications.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Please turn off your CAPS LOCK.
No personal attacks. Discuss issues & opinions rather than denigrating someone with an opposing view.
No political attacks. Refrain from using negative slang when identifying political parties.
Be truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the “Report” link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts or history behind an article.
Use your real name: Anonymous commenting is not allowed.